<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Executive Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.executive-post.info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.executive-post.info</link>
	<description>Confidential practical advice and motivation for leaders seeking their next senior executive role</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:42:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Make sure you can be recognised from your LinkedIn profile photograph</title>
		<link>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/make-sure-you-can-be-recognised-from-your-linkedin-profile-photograph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/make-sure-you-can-be-recognised-from-your-linkedin-profile-photograph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executive-post.info/?p=691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s really no doubt that you need a photograph to accompany your profile on LinkedIn. Not having one simply means that people will at best consider you&#8217;re a newbie on LI (and, by extrapolation, IT generally). At worst, they will think you have something to hide.</p> <p>Remember that you are using LI as a way <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.executive-post.info/2013/make-sure-you-can-be-recognised-from-your-linkedin-profile-photograph/">Make sure you can be recognised from your LinkedIn profile photograph</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s really no doubt that you need a photograph to accompany your profile on LinkedIn. Not having one simply means that people will at best consider you&#8217;re a newbie on LI (and, by extrapolation, IT generally). At worst, they will think you have something to hide.</p>
<p>Remember that you are using LI as a way of building relationships &#8211; primarily in a work context.</p>
<p>The photograph serves several purposes, but essentially it is part of the way in which people recognise you. This may be online &#8211; as it appears next to your name when posting comments on threads, creating threads yourself, sending messages, and contact requests. Offline, it allows people to recognise you when they walk into a crowded room.</p>
<p>I know of a few female members of LI who quite simply won&#8217;t entertain meeting someone offline without a photo.</p>
<p>Uploading a photo is extremely easy. You go to your profile page and click the &#8216;camera&#8217; icon that appears over the shadow head (or your original photo if you have one). From there on, you just need to browse to the photo you require and select the upload button. Here are the &#8216;official&#8217; instructions:<br />
<i><br />
<blockquote>You can add or change your profile photo from the Account section on your Settings page:</p>
<p>Click Browse to find the photo you wish to publish.<br />
Click Upload Photo.<br />
You can upload JPG, GIF or PNG files.<br />
File size &#8211; 4MB maximum.<br />
Pixel size: 200 x 200 minimum and 500 x 500 maximum.<br />
Your photo should be square<br />
Select who you want the photo to be visible to.<br />
Click Save Settings.</p></blockquote>
<p></i><br />
What should the photo look like? It&#8217;s important that people can use it to recognise you. Remember that most of the time the image they will see will be a small fragment on the screen. Personally, I favour a close up of the face rather than even a head and shoulders shot. Indeed, a passport photo is too distant for LinkedIn (and most other social media purposes).</p>
<p>Here are three versions of the same image, edited with the free photo editor that comes with Windows (known as Paint). They are displayed in three degrees of close up.</p>
<table style="background-color: #ffffff;" width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.executive-post.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/LIimage1a.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-695" alt="LIimage1a" src="http://www.executive-post.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/LIimage1a.jpg" width="150" /></a></td>
<td>I often come across LinkedIn images that are even further away than this first image. While our example is just about recognisable most of the image is taken up with his jacket!</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.executive-post.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/LIimage1b.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-696" alt="LIimage1b" src="http://www.executive-post.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/LIimage1b.jpg" width="150" /></a></td>
<td>The second example is a more typical head and shoulders shot (actually not that common on LinkedIn).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.executive-post.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/LIimage1c.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-697" alt="LIimage1c" src="http://www.executive-post.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/LIimage1c.jpg" width="150" /></a></td>
<td>Finally, a face-only shot. I&#8217;d argue that this person will be almost instantly recognisable in a coffee shop or networking meeting.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>While LinkedIn allows an image up to 4Mb in size, these images are only about 7.5Kb. There&#8217;s really no need for any more in this situation. That said, you might consider cropping a very high resolution image down to the facial element and then uploading it even though it is going to be rendered at a lower resolution.</p>
<p>Best wishes<br />
Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/make-sure-you-can-be-recognised-from-your-linkedin-profile-photograph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nine out of ten people don&#8217;t follow-up</title>
		<link>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/nine-out-of-ten-people-dont-follow-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/nine-out-of-ten-people-dont-follow-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 09:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executive-post.info/?p=681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Speaking at a networking event the other day, I did a quick straw poll to test out one of my theories about why so many people find such events a pointless exercise despite feeling compelled to go along. Not surprisingly, out of a group of nearly 40 people, only 2 claimed to have a systematic <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.executive-post.info/2013/nine-out-of-ten-people-dont-follow-up/">Nine out of ten people don&#8217;t follow-up</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="cu-mid" style="width: 180px; float: right; padding: 5px 5px 5px 5px; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" alt="" src="http://www.executive-post.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/5190befc76cb17359e03c69c361a7b2199e06_640.jpg" />Speaking at a networking event the other day, I did a quick straw poll to test out one of my theories about why so many people find such events a pointless exercise despite feeling compelled to go along. Not surprisingly, out of a group of nearly 40 people, only 2 claimed to have a systematic approach to following up after the meeting.</p>
<blockquote>
<h4>Confessional</h4>
<p>So, slapped wrist number 1: Nearly a fortnight ago, I was not only late for a business lunch, but also failed to write and thank the generous person who bought me it. This was outrageous &#8211; completely out of character for me, but evidence that I am not pretending that I get it right all the time.</p>
<p>And, slapped wrist number 2: Three weeks ago, I was invited to attend another breakfast meeting and to speak about my work. All went well, though there was perhaps a slight mismatch for one individual who seemed to think I was going to be pitching for work rather than talking about the underlying nature of the work I do. However, I have the list of delegates on my desk and I haven&#8217;t followed up.</p>
<p><i>Learning &#8211; I seem to have a little pattern emerging here&#8230; When something hasn&#8217;t worked perfectly, I seem to have a problem doing what I know I should do &#8211; write and thank people regardless.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>We all do it. We return from a meeting of some kind, with no specific thing to follow up but bundle of business cards in our pocket. We take them out and pop them on our desk and do nothing with them. We kid ourselves. We dream of having some super-gizmo that will scan them, add the details into a wonderful database, and then&#8230; nothing happens.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to do something about it. You need to be systematic. If you &#8216;blog&#8217;, have a newsletter, or write regularly, then you need these people on the distribution list for that. If you don&#8217;t, then you simply need them on your LinkedIn contact list.</p>
<p>With this in mind, the follow-up is really straightforward.</p>
<p>You only REALLY need three pieces of information from their card &#8211; their name, their email address and their contact phone number or SkypeID. Of course, you can keep other bits but you don&#8217;t really need them these days as so much information is available online.</p>
<ul>
<li>Keep a simple, ongoing, handwritten list of those three pieces of information &#8211; just to keep things simple. You&#8217;ll tick it once to say you&#8217;ve sent an email. Second, to say that you&#8217;ve added them to any mailing list that you maintain.  Strike out the details when you&#8217;ve sent a connection request on LinkedIn.</li>
<li>Have a standard block of text in Evernote (or a text file if you haven&#8217;t yet discovered the joy of using Evernote). Think of this as your postcard&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p>Dear NAME</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad we had the opportunity to meet at the networking event TODAY.</p>
<p>Every week or so, I write a business-related article. Rather than send a message about each one, I have a weekly digest. I&#8217;d like to add you to my list for this, if you don&#8217;t mind. (You can always unsubscribe at any time.)</p>
<p>I find the best way to get to know people is to have a one-to-one chat either in person or by phone and wondered if we could possibly schedule something over the next couple of weeks? Other than Tuesdays, I can fit in something most days, so I wondered if there would be a good time for you?</p>
<p>In recent years, LinkedIn seems to have become one of the best ways of keeping up to date with people&#8217;s business moves and interests, so I also wondered if we could connect there? I&#8217;ll send you a connection request in the next few hours.</p>
<p>With best wishes&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Send this email within 48hrs, adjusting the TODAY for YESTERDAY if necessary.</li>
<li>Log on to LinkedIn and send them a straightforward connection request. I usually prefer to customise these as the LI script is pretty awful, but as you&#8217;ve already warned them it&#8217;s on its way&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p>And that&#8217;s all there is to it, really. Of course, you can get more fancy, but there&#8217;s really no need &#8211; a significant improvement on where you were.</p>
<p>Oh, and one last thing &#8211; <b>NEVER TRY TO SELL SOMEONE SOMETHING OR TO ASK FOR A JOB DIRECTLY</b>. That isn&#8217;t the point!</p>
<p>Best wishes<br />
Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/nine-out-of-ten-people-dont-follow-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would you be interested in a free job hunting webinar?</title>
		<link>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/webinar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/webinar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executive-post.info/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you think it is worth me offering one? <p>I get a bit frustrated. There&#8217;s a lot of people who download my e-book. They read most of my tips that I send them afterwards. A small number of them contact me and arrange a free conversation.</p> <p>I do this work for two reasons &#8211; obviously <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.executive-post.info/2013/webinar/">Would you be interested in a free job hunting webinar?</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Do you think it is worth me offering one?</h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><img class="cu-mid" style="width: 200px; float: left; padding: 0px 15px 5px 0px;" alt="" src="http://www.executive-post.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/518fa634b2edf31edd00f69abc445b8b37d4f_640.jpg" />I get a bit frustrated. There&#8217;s a lot of people who download my e-book. They read most of my tips that I send them afterwards. A small number of them contact me and arrange a free conversation.</span></p>
<p>I do this work for two reasons &#8211; obviously to make a living, but far more important is that I love to see people fulfilled. I love to help someone who could be having a huge impact, but finds themselves out of the flow, to find their way back into it. Most of the people who do contact me, discover that there&#8217;s one or two things that they could be doing differently and, as soon as they put them into place, they find an offer lands in their lap. They don&#8217;t need my help &#8211; they aren&#8217;t prospective clients. Quite a few of them are also not really looking at senior executive roles but senior managerial ones &#8211; I really don&#8217;t mind &#8211; I&#8217;m happy to help them regardless.</p>
<p>It would be great to be able to help far more people in this way. But how can I do so?</p>
<p>One of my colleagues has suggested that I should offer a free webinar &#8211; a really practical online workshop for (senior (executive) / director / board-level) job hunters. It&#8217;s going to take quite a lot of work to prepare, to learn how to use the webinar system, promote it a bit more widely, and so on. Before I put in that effort, I would really appreciate your feedback&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>Do you think it is a worthwhile idea?</li>
<li>Would YOU personally be interested in joining in on one?</li>
</ul>
<p><b><a href="mailto:graham@executive-post.info">PLEASE click here and give me your thoughts.</a></b></p>
<p>Many thanks<br />
Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/webinar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;ve been out of work for so long &#8211; I&#8217;ve just not been that lucky</title>
		<link>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/ive-been-out-of-work-for-so-long-ive-just-not-been-that-lucky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/ive-been-out-of-work-for-so-long-ive-just-not-been-that-lucky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executive-post.info/?p=638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a very familiar plea. Sadly, a lot of the people who come to me have been trying for quite a while to find a new role, haven&#8217;t succeeded, and now their spouse is beginning to lose patience.</p> <p>A little while ago, I was interviewed for a job myself. It was an academic role <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.executive-post.info/2013/ive-been-out-of-work-for-so-long-ive-just-not-been-that-lucky/">I&#8217;ve been out of work for so long &#8211; I&#8217;ve just not been that lucky</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very familiar plea.  Sadly, a lot of the people who come to me have been trying for quite a while to find a new role, haven&#8217;t succeeded, and now their spouse is beginning to lose patience.</p>
<p>A little while ago, I was interviewed for a job myself.  It was an academic role but running an enterprise incubator &#8211; a kind of support hub for spin-off businesses from a well-known university.  What was great was that I could carry on doing the things I love doing &#8211; www.executive-post.info and www.the-confidant.info &#8211; at the same time.  There were four of us who&#8217;d been shortlisted and we each had to give a talk on innovative ways of teaching entrepreneurship.  As part of my research, I studied the syllabus and websites for as many similar institutions as I could find.  Aside from the <i>process</i> of teaching, I discovered two things that just about every well-known entrepreneur will describe as having been key to their success and yet virtually never featured in any syllabus &#8211; they were LUCK and CONNECTIONS.  Now, to be fair, a few business schools did teach basic networking, though they didn&#8217;t relate it directly to enterprise success.</p>
<p>[Sadly, I didn't get the job, so if anyone is in a position to offer me something similar PLEASE get in touch!]</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written a lot about networking in the past, so I&#8217;d like to concentrate on the LUCK element here.</p>
<p>In the context of a job hunter, what might the upshot of that &#8216;luck&#8217; be?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s landing a job.  It&#8217;s being offered a job by someone.  It&#8217;s being introduced to that someone, or being introduced to someone else who knew that someone.  It&#8217;s happening to meet someone who could help.  It&#8217;s about something that led to you meeting that someone.  And it&#8217;s about doing so at the right time, rather than the wrong one or simply too late.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably about a lot more things but when someone says to you that they&#8217;ve &#8220;just not been that lucky&#8221;, it&#8217;s usually one or more of these that apply.</p>
<p>Now managing your networking (having said I wouldn&#8217;t reflect on this) is about the systematic process of contacting, meeting, impressing and maintaining contact with, people who could help you achieve your purpose &#8211; usually a referral to someone in the position to employ you.</p>
<p>Since systematic and luck aren&#8217;t really seen as ready bedfellows, the luck bit must be something different to the networking bit.</p>
<p>&#8220;Happening&#8221; is an interesting word too.  It implies that something regularly happens.  In other words, it really does take place.  It&#8217;s a bit of a mis-construct if we say that we haven&#8217;t been lucky, when we actually mean we haven&#8217;t done anything.</p>
<p>Now the decision to employ someone is not just random either.  If I want a new IT director, and someone with a background in grounds maintenance walks in, I&#8217;m not going to offer them a job.  So the timing must be right, the people who meet must be right, and the knowledge must be right.  That&#8217;s when &#8216;luck&#8217; tends to appear.</p>
<p>So &#8216;luck&#8217; is about the coincidence of our ongoing networking, our specialist know-how, and a need on their part.  And therein lies the rub&#8230;</p>
<p>When we are in a role, we are constantly observing what&#8217;s going on, learning about it, making adjustments to what we do to accommodate those little gems, incorporating this knowledge into our psyche so that we can bring it out when we need it later.  We might not be, indeed often are not, aware of what is happening.  But what makes a good employee and certainly a good executive is this constant learning and adaptation.  What impresses colleagues and bosses is that their knowledge is up to date and that they have already adapted to fit it into their work.  Of course, some of the knowledge is simply of the form that I describe as; &#8220;Here&#8217;s somewhere or someone to watch for later.&#8221;</p>
<p>When a lot of people are made redundant, or leave a role for whatever reason, they stop doing this learning and adapting.  This means that when they DO meet someone who could offer them a role, they don&#8217;t inspire them &#8211; they don&#8217;t have those gems of subject or market knowledge that would set them apart.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, their chance of meeting the right person is a bit random too.  You see, if you know that a particular topic is hot in that industry, and you have ideas as to how to address it, you don&#8217;t devote your energy going to meet any old contact &#8211; you focus on the ones who have that need.  If necessary, you even expand your network to include them (and those who know them) in it.</p>
<p>Now, I know that this is a sweeping generalisation, but sadly all too often, when I meet someone who says; &#8220;I&#8217;ve just not been that lucky.&#8221;, I will usually discover that they haven&#8217;t been keeping up with their specialisation since they left work (if they even did so while they were in it) and that they haven&#8217;t thought of targeting people and organisations that must need (or need to adapt to) the changes in that discipline.</p>
<p>Darren is a good example and he has agreed to me mentioning him.  He has a postgraduate degree in a discipline that has relatively few large players within it, but a reasonable number of smaller ones who subcontract to them.  A massive Europe-wide contract was awarded to the French-based major player, while Darren was working for the UK-based competitor.  His firm made him redundant.  For twelve months, he recovered himself, explored alternative Masters programmes, considered a completely different career, and got steadily melancholic thinking that he would never work in his chosen field again.  We made contact online initially, then followed up with a phone call.  He used the &#8216;luck&#8217; line with me and I pursued the same line of enquiry with him as I have described above.</p>
<p>He agreed to prepare a one-side summary of the key issues facing the industry, now that it was nearly 18 months into this French-based contract.  He identified two key problems &#8211; smaller subcontractors were already appearing to be unable to deliver the technology solutions that they had been expected to deliver and the major player was being heavily scrutinised in the media for its impending failure to meet certain critical milestones.  Now this observation was happening in the English-speaking media and not the French.</p>
<p>Darren felt that he knew as much as anyone else about the technology and what needed to be done to deliver on time.  He didn&#8217;t claim to have the answers to the problems, but he knew how to manage the project to deliver them.</p>
<p>Acting slightly circumspectly, he asked around the Alumni group of his original employer to see if anyone knew anyone else who worked in the French market.  A name was given, a British former colleague now based in Paris.  He rang the person.  They spoke the same language &#8211; not just English but the same technical and management languages.  Darren was very open &#8211; he had to be &#8211; he had only one opportunity.  The Brit-abroad worked for the main contractor, but wasn&#8217;t involved directly in the impending crises but he promised to put Darren in touch with the person who did.  Later that afternoon, Darren was called by the Frenchman.  Two DAYS later he was in Paris and working for the firm &#8211; even though it would take several months for his security clearances to come through!</p>
<p>So, if you find yourself in this situation there are four things to do&#8230;</p>
<ol>
<li>Start to prepare a one page summary of the key developments, both technical and commercial, that have been going on in your field in the last 12 months.</li>
<li>Identify who will have a need as a result.</li>
<li>Create a mini-list of your contacts who may be involved in, or have colleagues who are involved in, these areas.</li>
<li>Target your networking on these contacts.</li>
</ol>
<p>I wish you every success, but don&#8217;t forget that I am only at the end of a phone and will be very happy to help you.</p>
<p>Cheers, Graham.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/ive-been-out-of-work-for-so-long-ive-just-not-been-that-lucky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learning something new or going through hoops &#8211; and for whose benefit?</title>
		<link>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/learning-something-new-or-going-through-hoops-and-for-whose-benefit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/learning-something-new-or-going-through-hoops-and-for-whose-benefit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executive-post.info/?p=636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a great believer in paperwork exercises &#8211; simply documenting something that you&#8217;d do anyway in order to gain a piece of paper seems intrinsically wrong to me. It&#8217;s a question of how much effort is necessary. When the form filling becomes too onerous, but is still only documenting what&#8217;s already been achieved, then <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.executive-post.info/2013/learning-something-new-or-going-through-hoops-and-for-whose-benefit/">Learning something new or going through hoops &#8211; and for whose benefit?</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a great believer in paperwork exercises &#8211; simply documenting something that you&#8217;d do anyway in order to gain a piece of paper seems intrinsically wrong to me.   It&#8217;s a question of how much effort is necessary.  When the form filling becomes too onerous, but is still only documenting what&#8217;s already been achieved, then I figure the system needs changing.  Sadly though, this isn&#8217;t the way the rest of the world looks on it.</p>
<p>The other week, I was running a course for a health organisation.  The participants had been told that they should attend.  They accepted that it was necessary to refresh their skills from time-to-time and so arrived but not really expecting to learn anything.  At the end of the day, two of them came up to me &#8211; when they&#8217;d introduced themselves at the outset they&#8217;d made it clear that they were both highly qualified and experienced.  They both wanted to say how much they&#8217;d enjoyed the day, how they&#8217;d felt embraced by me and by involving them in the delivery of the training, they&#8217;d felt more respected than they often did at work. We had a hug, shed a little tear, agreed that the system was a little silly, and went about our ways.</p>
<p>Too often though, it seems to me that respect for the individual is lost by bureaucratic systems that we pretend are there to promote professionalism and protect clients and customers.  It&#8217;s something I have often encountered in corporate OD (organisation development) but it seems to be particularly true in professional development arenas.</p>
<p>When I was 17, I&#8217;d qualified as both a swimming and lifesaving teacher, which meant that I could &#8216;sign off&#8217; Duke of Edinburgh Award forms for others but because I hadn&#8217;t registered for the Award before I sat my exams (which you had to do as a swimming teacher in those days), I couldn&#8217;t get one myself.  A friend and I regularly used to go on long-distance walks &#8211; including bivouacking overnight &#8211; yet, again, because we&#8217;d not registered for the Award we couldn&#8217;t include these retrospectively.  Our school encouraged us to engage in &#8216;social action&#8217;, and yet, my many teenage hours voluntarily teaching swimming and doing Red Cross first-aid duties were not eligible because I hadn&#8217;t registered first.  </p>
<p>The DoE system has, at last, been changed but not, I&#8217;d argue, for the better.  Now, you start out by saying what you&#8217;ll do for the next few weeks (and I mean weeks), do it, and get someone to sign it off.  There&#8217;s no minimum standard &#8211; you just have to say what you&#8217;ll do.  So, the other day I was confronted by a mother whose child had done a fraction of the amount of work that others would do, but because the child had not said it would do anything in particular in the first place, I was expected to sign it off regardless.</p>
<p>The other month, I attended a &#8220;professional development day&#8221; for one of my &#8216;professions&#8217;.  The content was interesting, though not really that developmental, and a lot of time was devoted to networking with our competitors (sorry, I mean &#8216;peers&#8217;)  but it was all OK because we were issued with a fancy A4 certificate for our CPD records.</p>
<p>This kind of situation, where the bureaucracy overtakes the learning, seems to permeate quasi-professions.   The real professions (medicine, law, accountancy, and architecture) have their fill of paperwork, I&#8217;m sure, but they don&#8217;t depend on the &#8216;apprentice&#8217; registering first, THEN gaining experience, THEN documenting their learning, and only THEN being formally accepted.  Instead they work in parallel.</p>
<p>A little while ago, I sat in on a course sponsored by the local government, for entrepreneurs starting up their first business.  It was the main component of a package intended to boost enterprise in the local area.  It involved ten sessions spread over three months with a quite detailed, though extremely inflexible and prescriptive, structured approach.  (Interestingly, every page was splattered with copyright marks.)  I&#8217;m far from convinced that if anyone worked religiously through the manual and course their business would be any more successful than any other.  If nothing else, luck and networking &#8211; two essentials of successful enterprise &#8211; weren&#8217;t mentioned.  It was run in the evening.  An interesting choice &#8211; to run a course on business in the evening &#8211; which must say something about how core it was seen to running a successful enterprise and about the organisers attitude to life-work balance.  Anyway, at the end of the third or fourth session, when questions were invited, someone raised their arm and asked; &#8220;Do we get a certificate at the end of the course?&#8221;  I felt my heart sink, and judging from the groan around the room I wasn&#8217;t alone.  But perhaps this individual had cause to enquire&#8230;.?</p>
<p>I find myself in a strange position today, being asked to present a portfolio of my experience to an organisation simply so that they can decide whether to confer on me their &#8216;professional membership&#8217;, when the reality is that I&#8217;ve been an accepted and practicing member of one of their competitors for some years.</p>
<p>So, that&#8217;s the gripe.  But the system isn&#8217;t going to change.  What have I learnt along the way?</p>
<p>Well, if you are considering doing something developmental &#8211; such as taking even a very straightforward training course &#8211; think VERY hard beforehand and ask yourself how you intend using it well into the future.  If you might conceivably want to do so for quasi-professional purposes, then do your research &#8211; find out beforehand how that discipline manages itself, whether certain activities are accepted, and whether certain providers are somehow favoured above others.  Of course, it&#8217;s hard to look into the future that far, but where possible, if you&#8217;re going to spend money and invest effort you might as well make sure that you get a double- or even triple- whammy benefit.  </p>
<p>I often counsel executives considering doing an MBA.  The same argument applies.  How are you expecting it to help?  Does your particular profession (eg business sector) respect people with this qualification?  If you see it as a building block in your career &#8211; decide on the career first, then choose the course.  You might be surprised how many people see an MBA as an opportunity to create a career transition without thinking where they want to go &#8211; instead, they see it as an opportunity to stop doing what they have been doing.  If it is relevant, then fine, but if there&#8217;s some doubt &#8211; do more research before signing up.  If you are wanting to satisfy your own intellectual needs, then many people don&#8217;t realise just how many other options there are that they could pursue.</p>
<p>When choosing one provider over another, look carefully at the content and the process by which it&#8217;s delivered.  If it appears to be a hoop leaping exercise rather than a genuine learning experience, ask yourself whether that&#8217;s really what you want.  If the methods resonate with you, great &#8211; but if they seem more concerned with validating the provider than embedding new material in you, ask twice.</p>
<p>Best wishes<br />
Graham</p>
<hr /><i>Dr Graham Wilson is an organisational psychotherapist and leadership confidant, who works with people in positions of power, helping them understand psycho-dynamics, politics, and behaviour, as they affect them in their day-to-day work, and navigate through them to achieve far greater things. He also provides very practical support to senior executives as they hunt for more fulfilling roles.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/learning-something-new-or-going-through-hoops-and-for-whose-benefit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using a portfolio</title>
		<link>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/using-a-portfolio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/using-a-portfolio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 01:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executive-post.info/?p=632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the &#8220;Senior Executive Emergency Job Hunt&#8221;, I wrote quite a bit about the benefits of having a physical portfolio representing your past achievements. Whether you carry it around in a loose leaf binder or as separate sheets in an envelope, the key thing is that the pages are pictures rather than text.</p> <p>In conversations <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.executive-post.info/2013/using-a-portfolio/">Using a portfolio</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the &#8220;Senior Executive Emergency Job Hunt&#8221;, I wrote quite a bit about the benefits of having a physical portfolio representing your past achievements.  Whether you carry it around in a loose leaf binder or as separate sheets in an envelope, the key thing is that the pages are pictures rather than text.</p>
<p>In conversations with people to whom you have been introduced by another contact, it is too tempting to discuss the weather, economy, general demise of manufacturing and a myriad of other things and then get to the end of the meeting without them actually getting to know what you can do and how well.</p>
<p>Designers learnt this years ago, and they often carry a folio (in their case a large one) with examples of past work.  Executives don&#8217;t have the same ready made stock of items, so they have to be creative.  You might want to include some product images, a photo of your company headquarters, a copy of the brand logo,  photographs of a specific project, or a team of people.</p>
<p>You do not want words and text to appear as they will distract from the image.  Besides, images are far more flexible props to your story telling.  And that&#8230; story telling&#8230; is what the portfolio is all about.</p>
<p>For each image, prepare some notes and then review and review until you can describe the particular achievement fluently.  File the notes away &#8211; avoid taking them with you.</p>
<p>If nothing else, be ready to interrupt the flow of the conversation and say; &#8220;I&#8217;ve bought along some examples of what I have achieved &#8211; could I perhaps tell about one of them?  I think it might help you see what I have to offer&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Make sure that the stories stand up to a little scrutiny, and don&#8217;t use one that is a direct competitor to the individual&#8217;s firm.  </p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like an example of a creative illustration, take a look at Martin&#8217;s here: <a href="http://www.executive-post.info/2012/executive-chef-says-the-nicest-people-use-hp-sauce/">http://www.executive-post.info/2012/executive-chef-says-the-nicest-people-use-hp-sauce/</a></p>
<p>Best wishes<br />
Graham<br />
07785 222380</p>
<p>PS Don&#8217;t forget that I offer a free hour long review of your progress in job hunting so far.  There&#8217;s no heavy pressure sales patter &#8211; I am genuinely keen to help.   A lot of people have taken me up on it, and then commented a few days later that it transformed their approach and success.  To fix a time, just give me a call on the number above and we&#8217;ll do something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/using-a-portfolio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global access to your emails</title>
		<link>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/global-access-to-your-emails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/global-access-to-your-emails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executive-post.info/?p=628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Back in the 90s, gadget makers had a phrase for consultants and trainers who drove around the country, or flew around the world, doing their work &#8211; &#8220;road warriors&#8221;. [Tom Peters had another phrase - "seagull consultants".] Back then, intrnational standards and global solutions were only just emerging and, if you asked anyone about &#8216;cloud <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.executive-post.info/2013/global-access-to-your-emails/">Global access to your emails</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.the-confidant.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/jo1a.jpg"><img src="http://www.the-confidant.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/jo1a.jpg" width="175"  class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1201" /></a>Back in the 90s, gadget makers had a phrase for consultants and trainers who drove around the country, or flew around the world, doing their work &#8211; &#8220;road warriors&#8221;.  [Tom Peters had another phrase - "seagull consultants".]  Back then, intrnational standards and global solutions were only just emerging and, if you asked anyone about &#8216;cloud computing&#8217; they&#8217;d probably think you&#8217;d got your (only just invented) laptop out on an aeroplane.  All kinds of gizmos were invented to allow you to hook up to foreign telephone systems to access fledgling email systems.</p>
<p>In the late 90s and early 00s, the bits of plastic gave way to software based solutions, but many of these too were a little Heath Robinson-esque and quite expensive to boot.  The legacy of this persists today with the extortionate rates that mobile phone operators charge for roaming &#8211; especially when you are simply accessing your own network through one owned by the same operator in a different country.</p>
<p>Back then the warrior on the road, often had to resort to an internet cafe, and to use an unbelievably slow and clunky web-mail site to get at their messages.</p>
<p>Most of you reading this are probably saying; &#8220;So what?&#8221;  Well in the last two weeks, I&#8217;ve been in conversation with three travelling consultants who were struggling to keep going with their old style systems and hadn&#8217;t realised that there&#8217;s a much easier approach almost instantly available to them.</p>
<p>THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE &#8211; so, if you&#8217;re still a little bemused as to why I&#8217;m writing this, I&#8217;d just close the message and go on to another one!  I do appreciate that this is a little&#8230; basic.  I have also tried to keep it simple and may have blurred a couple of definitions &#8211; thanks for noticing, but don&#8217;t feel you need to discuss them here!</p>
<p>So&#8230; for the rest of us:</p>
<p>You already have an email service provider &#8211; some will be the standard service provided by most internet service providers, ISPs (eg BT Connect), others are generic (eg Demon), but most are specific to a domain name that you (or your institution) have registered (eg grahamwilson.org).  (These personal domains are so inexpensive (c£6 per year) that anyone can have one. ) Some people don&#8217;t realise that all of these can be made to work with any system &#8211; you don&#8217;t have to stick with the one that was installed on your laptop, or was described in the set-up of your wifi.  Similarly, just because your ISP gave you an email address you don&#8217;t need to use it!</p>
<p>The tool that an increasing number of people prefer, regardless of where or how they are accessing their email, IS a webmail provider, but it&#8217;s one that&#8217;s so well developed that it has become the &#8216;email client&#8217; of choice for many, many people.  An &#8216;email client&#8217; is the generic term used to describe software programs that allow you to access, read, store, compose and send, emails.  Previously popular examples were Microsoft Outlook and Mozilla Thunderbird.  These were entirely based on your computer.  </p>
<p>The tool that people tend to prefer these days is provided by Google.  With the exception of a few trouble-spots around the world, Google (www.google.com) is accessible almost everywhere.  Gmail does everything that Outlook or Thunderbird do &#8211; it just does them all a little better.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t HAVE to use their browser (Google Chrome) though there may be a few techie benefits from doing so.  Thus, if you prefer Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer (IE), Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox or whatever, that&#8217;s fine too.</p>
<p>To get started, you just go to the Google site &#8211; yes, the one that you visit every day to do searches.  Look at the black strip at the top and you&#8217;ll see one of the options is Gmail.  Go there and sign up for a personal email account.  PLEASE bear in mind my comments in previous posts about selecting a professional sounding email address &#8211; it isn&#8217;t critical here, as no-one will necessarily see the gmail email address, but it still makes sense.</p>
<p>Unlike other webmail services, Gmail is available both online and offline.  Your messages are held centrally, but they synchronise with copies on any other machine that you wish to use.  Once you are up and running, email can be synchronised between the two so you need never be without anything.   I have all of mine sychnronised with my laptop, 12 month&#8217;s worth on my Android tablet, and the last 300 on my smartphone.</p>
<p>Messages with attachments can be stored within the Gmail system, so you don&#8217;t need to download them all to a folder structure on your machine.  What&#8217;s more, the Gmail storage system is like all others in allowing you to store messages in folders, but it also allows you to attach simple &#8216;tags&#8217; to them &#8211; this makes it easy to find messages on the same topic that have been filed across many different folders.  Yes, there&#8217;s a learning curve, but the flexibility of this online, cloud-based, email system is profoundly better than anything else that you&#8217;ll have encountered.</p>
<p>Because Gmail has become so endemic, it is available on most &#8216;platforms&#8217; &#8211; thus you can access it through Windows (whatever version), the iOS used by IPads etc, Android &#8211; the standard for smartphones and tablet computers, and Linux &#8211; the operating system that&#8217;s very popular with institutions.  You simply access your Gmail from ANY device and it will synchronise as much information as you wish among them &#8211; so you can work on &#8216;that&#8217; report using any device.</p>
<p>Nowadays, most people already have a couple of email addresses &#8211; in some cases, many &#8211; usually one personal and one for work.  The beauty of the Gmail interface, is that you can attach several different email accounts (reflected in different email addresses) to the one system.  When Google retrieves the messages from each account, by default it puts them all in the same &#8216;inbox&#8217; but it tags (labels) them so that they are easy to find and distinguish.  You can tell it if you&#8217;d like to have them go in different folders.  </p>
<p>You simply set each account up in exactly the same way that you would have with Outlook in the past, using POP3 settings to do so.  The POP3 settings are usually easy to find somewhere on the site of any email provider and they consist of the username, password, outgoing email server and incoming email server.  (Gmail comes with a tool to find these automatically for many service providers.)</p>
<p>Gmail uses the POP3 settings to contact your original email service provider(s) to see if there are any new messages waiting for you, and then copies these to the Gmail system.  It does this very frequently so there&#8217;s rarely any delay in getting new ones.  Thunderbird and Outlook check in the same way, though they tend to do so every 15 minutes by default.</p>
<p>One of the options for most email clients, such as Gmail, is whether to keep your emails in their original inbox once you have transferred them.  In the past, working with something like Outlook on your own laptop, you might have not deleted them for safety in case there was a glitch in the transfer.  The risks are probably less with Gmail, but I&#8217;ve got mine set to delete everything after 30 days &#8211; that way there&#8217;s a safety margin without building up a huge store that you&#8217;ll never access.</p>
<p>Once they are linked you can &#8216;compose&#8217; messages in Gmail and then send them from any of your accounts.  You can set up different default fonts, signatures, etc for each.</p>
<p>So, in a nutshell:</p>
<ol>
<li>Register for a Gmail account</li>
<li>Set up your existing accounts through the Gmail interface using POP3</li>
</ol>
<p>Once it&#8217;s up and running, you can import your existing address book(s) to Google Contacts, and you can import your existing emails from Outlook or Thunderbird to Gmail.  Or you can breath lightly at having a new greenfield structire and can redesign your filing system!</p>
<p>I realise that this isn&#8217;t the usual kind of blog entry, but I hope it&#8217;ll help one or two of you.</p>
<p>Best wishes<br />
<img alt="Graham." src="http://www.gbw247.info/images/grahamsig3.jpg" width="162" height="112"><br />
<b>Graham Wilson</b><br />
<a href="http://www.the-confidant.info">the-confidant.info</a> | <a href="http://www.executive-post.info">executive-post.info</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/global-access-to-your-emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skype interviews: Is it more tricky to be grilled by video?</title>
		<link>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/skype-interviews-is-it-more-tricky-to-be-grilled-by-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/skype-interviews-is-it-more-tricky-to-be-grilled-by-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executive-post.info/?p=615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An article by Hannah Briggs, in the BBC News Magazine, entitled; &#8220;Skype interviews: Is it more tricky to be grilled by video?&#8221; highlights the growth in popularity of video-telephony interviews (primarily using Skype) among HR professionals. In the US more than 60% of HR professionals use such interviews for their initial interview process at least.</p> <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.executive-post.info/2013/skype-interviews-is-it-more-tricky-to-be-grilled-by-video/">Skype interviews: Is it more tricky to be grilled by video?</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.executive-post.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/bigstock-a-business-man-expresses-vario-25907015.jpg"><img src="http://www.executive-post.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/bigstock-a-business-man-expresses-vario-25907015.jpg" alt="bigstock-a-business-man-expresses-vario-25907015" width="250" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-618" /></a>An article by Hannah Briggs, in the BBC News Magazine, entitled; &#8220;<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-21334710">Skype interviews: Is it more tricky to be grilled by video?</a>&#8221; highlights the growth in popularity of video-telephony interviews (primarily using Skype) among HR professionals.  In the US more than 60% of HR professionals use such interviews for their initial interview process at least.</p>
<p>The article offers some useful tips on how to come across the best.  The last of these is to test your system with a friend first.  I&#8217;d reinforce this strongly.  </p>
<p>A few other things to consider&#8230;</p>
<p>Without going over the top, it might be worth creating a small home-studio for business oriented video calls &#8211; they are becoming far more common and a firm that interviews this way is probably going to rely on this technology during its day-to-day operations too.  Think about removing distractions, a simple cloth backdrop (I&#8217;ve used white calico for mine), and away from the hustle and bustle of the home.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B003R1P8WY/ref=nosim?tag=956">high definition web-cam</a> with a wired connection to the USB port, will produce far better quality images than the built in camera on most laptops.</p>
<p>Webcams don&#8217;t have to be mounted on top of the computer either.  Consider setting yours up at an angle slightly above, to one side, and forward of you.  Mine is mounted about three feet away on an adjacent bookcase.</p>
<p>Positioned in this way you can be seen to be following the interview carefully on your laptop at a desk or table, without picking up every wrinkle, baggy eyes, and double chins.</p>
<p>While pundits often say that eye contact is essential, my experience is that a more remote image that shows you in a professional environment, clean, tidy and well presented overall creates a strong impression.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.executive-post.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/bigstock-smiling-girl-with-laptop-bro-32026880.jpg"><img src="http://www.executive-post.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/bigstock-smiling-girl-with-laptop-bro-32026880.jpg" alt="bigstock-smiling-girl-with-laptop--bro-32026880" width="250" class="alignright size-full wp-image-619" /></a>While a few people might like to make themselves look like a fighter pilot or Formula 1 mechanic, headsets do not flatter anyone.  If the speakers on your laptop aren&#8217;t that good, then get a pair of powered extensions, though usually this isn&#8217;t necessary.</p>
<p>What is also worth investing in, is a simple desktop microphone.  Ideally a  unidirectional microphone, this will cut out background noise from the room, but also much more importantly hums from fans and electrical interference from the computer.  I&#8217;ve experimented with quite a few over the years, but my favourite is a really simple one made by <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B000185ALA/ref=nosim?tag=956">Trust</a>.</p>
<p>Finally, some lighting.  For this kind of set-up, all you really need is good domestic lights.  However, I&#8217;ve found that a reasonably bright desklamp (mine&#8217;s an <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B000K2Q9NU/ref=nosim?tag=956">Anglepoise</a> fitted with a very low energy LED bulb) on the desk in front of me, makes sure that the camera doesn&#8217;t have to adjust dynamically for low light and so produce unpredictable dark shadows etc.</p>
<p>Once you have the system set up, try it out with a friend and make sure that angles are flattering, backgrounds simple, and that the sound levels are good.  The last thing you want to be playing around with during an interview are the settings of your computer.</p>
<p>Best wishes<br />
<img alt="Graham." src="http://www.gbw247.info/images/grahamsig3.jpg" width="162" height="112"><br />
<b>Graham Wilson</b><br />
<a href="http://www.the-confidant.info">the-confidant.info</a> | <a href="http://www.executive-post.info">executive-post.info</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/skype-interviews-is-it-more-tricky-to-be-grilled-by-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Job applications rocket on Christmas Day</title>
		<link>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/job-applications-rocket-on-christmas-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/job-applications-rocket-on-christmas-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executive-post.info/?p=607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to the trade journal, HR Magazine, the number of people applying for jobs online significantly increased on Christmas Day when compared to the previous year. I think they may have been desperate for copy &#8211; the article itself is clearly pure PR. I hardly think that a sample of those people using one job <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.executive-post.info/2013/job-applications-rocket-on-christmas-day/">Job applications rocket on Christmas Day</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the trade journal, HR Magazine, the number of people applying for jobs online significantly increased on Christmas Day when compared to the previous year.  I think they may have been desperate for copy &#8211; the article itself is clearly pure PR.  I hardly think that a sample of those people using one job hunting forum and one, specialist, recruitment agency is representative of the population as a whole.  (
<li>http://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/hro/news/1075875/job-applications-rocket-christmas-day</li>
<p>).</p>
<p>However, I certainly noticed an upsurge in people registering on my own website to download my senior executive job-hunt book and receive the free tips that follow.</p>
<p>If you were one of those, PLEASE don&#8217;t forget that I also offer a free conversation to review your job hunt so far.</p>
<p>Best wishes<br />
Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.executive-post.info/2013/job-applications-rocket-on-christmas-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A slightly different perspective on &#8216;resolutions&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.executive-post.info/2012/a-slightly-different-perspective-on-resolutions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.executive-post.info/2012/a-slightly-different-perspective-on-resolutions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executive-post.info/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Right now, thousands of people are sitting down in a reflective space and asking themselves what their resolutions for 2013 will be.</p> <p> Typically, a resolution is a repetitive behaviour that will, in the mind of the resolver, lead to some kind of positive outcome &#8211; OK, a goal &#8211; that may, or may not, <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.executive-post.info/2012/a-slightly-different-perspective-on-resolutions/">A slightly different perspective on &#8216;resolutions&#8217;</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now, thousands of people are sitting down in a reflective space and asking themselves what their resolutions for 2013 will be.</p>
<p>
Typically, a resolution is a repetitive behaviour that will, in the mind of the resolver, lead to some kind of positive outcome &#8211; OK, a goal &#8211; that may, or may not, be defined as part of the resolution too.  Lots of peoples&#8217; resolutions end up looking something like this:</p>
<p>
<i>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;I will eat smaller portions.&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;I will budget every month.&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;I will re-read my emails before I send them &#8211; to correct the grammar and check that the meaning is clear.&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;I will exercise at least three times a week for 40 minutes.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p></i></p>
<p>
There&#8217;s absolutely nothing wrong with any of these.  They are aimed at lifestyle change and there&#8217;s probably good reasons behind each, but they don&#8217;t inspire you and the reward isn&#8217;t a part of the &#8216;vision&#8217;, so they soon become a drudge.</p>
<p>
The purpose of &#8216;resolutions&#8217; is for us to become a different person &#8211; albeit in tiny ways sometimes.</p>
<p>
According to recent research, there are three things that lead us to do more of something, and that give greater personal satisfaction.  By embracing these in your resolutions there&#8217;s a far higher chance of you fulfilling the ultimate goal that they were directed towards.</p>
<p>
The three factors are:
<ul>
<li>Autonomy</li>
<li>Mastery</li>
<li>Purpose</li>
</ul>
<p>
<b>Autonomy</b> is about doing something that YOU want to do &#8211; not something that has been imposed on you by others.  So, give a bit of thought to your resolutions.  Are you doing these because they will please someone else?  If so, do YOU want to do them?  If not, is there something that YOU DO want to do that might have the same effect, but be more about YOU and less about THEM?</p>
<p>
<b>Mastery</b> is around improving your ability to your satisfaction.  This is why many runners monitor their &#8216;PB&#8217; &#8211; their Personal Best.  But performance, and mastery of something, go far beyond the simple statistics.  It is about becoming your own expert on something.  If your resolutions include repetitive actions, consider turning these into some aspect of mastery.</p>
<p>
<b>Purpose</b> involves going beyond yourself.  Most resolutions revolve around the individual, but we will see them through if we have a bigger, a transcendent, purpose.  So&#8230;  rather than setting a load of little repetitive changes to your behaviour, try seeing them as stepping stones to a bigger goal and say WHY you are doing them.</p>
<p>
I apply the same principles when helping a new senior executive getting themselves ready for their &#8220;first 100 days&#8221; in a new role.   There will be a load of things that they believe they are EXPECTED to do without necessarily believing that they are worthwhile.  There will be plenty that are repetitive but don&#8217;t lead to any IMPROVEMENT.  Frequently, they have inherited an organisation that has lost its sense of PURPOSE.  We draw up a plan that aims to address each of these for both the executive and their team.</p>
<p>
As to the four examples above, which arose in conversations with friends and colleagues over the last couple of weeks before Christmas&#8230;.</p>
<p>
<i>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;I am going to write an e-book &#8216;Great food for the busy executive&#8217;.&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;I am going to offer a mentoring service online for people who want to tackle their debt.&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;I am going to qualify as a Teacher of English as a Foreign Language.&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;I am going to enter a long distance sponsored cycle ride and raise funds for Macmillan.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p></i></p>
<p>
Give it a try, and why not share the result here?  (If you struggle give me a call.)</p>
<p>
Best wishes
<p>
<img src="http://www.gbw247.info/power/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/grahamsig3.jpg" /><br />
Graham Wilson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.executive-post.info/2012/a-slightly-different-perspective-on-resolutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
